January 9, 2009  

[ back ]


Council divided on proclamation

(by Terrence T. McDonald - October 23, 2008)

A proclamation honoring a Montclair group that regularly rallies for peace divided the Montclair Township Council Tuesday night.

Critics said it was inappropriate for the council to wade into charged political waters.

Proponents said the honor is an expression of admiration for community activisim.

The group, Montclair Peace Vigil, has gathered for seven years at the intersection of Church Street and Bloomfield Avenue, or at Watchung Plaza, where they are often greeted by honks of support (or protest) from drivers-by.

After a story about the upcoming proclamation - which honors the group for their "courageous stand for peace" - appeared in a recent edition of The Star-Ledger, First Ward Councilman Rich Murnick said he received phone calls from residents who believed the council should not take a stance for or against peace.

Murnick said honoring the group with a proclamation did not make him comfortable.

"I'm all in favor of peace," he said. "I just feel there are certain issues that have a political overtone to it that I just want to see the council step away from."

Mayor Jerry Fried, who was in favor of the proclamation, said its purpose is to honor the people who compose Montclair Peace Vigil. He likened the proclamation to those the council regularly gives to local churches, some of which, Fried noted, may not advocate positions he agrees with.

"It's a generic, positive message about community activists," he said, adding that the proclamation's message is "we should be working on peaceful solutions to issues."

In the end, the proclamation was signed only by Fried and council members Renee Baskerville, Nick Lewis, and Kathryn Weller. Murnick declined to sign the proclamation, as did council members Cary Africk and Roger Terry.

In a conference session before the council meeting, Africk said the council's involvement in issues of war and peace is not appropriate. He added that the council might not honor groups with stances on the opposite side of the political spectrum, like anti-abortion protestors.

Reached by phone Wednesday morning after the meeting, Murnick said he thinks he and the rest of the council should focus on Montclair, not issues of war and peace.

"I took this position to help govern the township and not take political sides, and I think that this possibly has a political side," he said.

 


 

Comments (1)
On October 30, 2008, t.k. said:

"...Rich Murnick said he recieved phone calls from residents [names?]who believed the council should not take a stance for or against peace." For or against peace.... Who, among us, is "against peace"? Apparently three members of the town's council are.
 

 

[ back ]

Sign Up For Our Latest Updates & Notices

* Name
* Email
I agree to the terms of the site policy.
Advertisement

The Montclair Times
114 Valley Rd
Montclair, NJ 07042
973-233-5025
Kaesu Inc.
Powered By Kaesu
 Copyright 2009